The Boston Strangler is a recent true crime drama that has been met with mixed reviews from audiences and critics alike. The series follows the investigation of a serial killer who is believed to have killed at least five women in the 1960s, each of whom was strangled using a specific technique.

One of the main criticisms of the series is its lack of depth in exploring the motives behind the killings. While the show does touch on themes such as revenge and anger, it fails to delve deep into why the killer felt compelled to commit these heinous acts. Without a clear understanding of the killer’s psyche, the viewer is left feeling unsatisfied and frustrated.

Additionally, the series struggles to accurately represent the time period in which it takes place. While certain aspects of the show are based on actual events, others are heavily dramatized or exaggerated for the sake of entertainment. This can be off-putting for viewers who were expecting a more accurate representation of history.

Despite these criticisms, there are some aspects of the Boston Strangler that do shine through. The acting is strong, with standout performances from Keira Knightley and Peter Mullan. The show also features several gripping moments that will keep viewers on the edge of their seats.

In conclusion, while the Boston Strangler is a decent true crime drama, it falls short in terms of depth and accuracy. Viewers who are looking for a more in-depth exploration of this dark chapter in history may be disappointed, but those who enjoy a thrilling and suspenseful ride will likely find something to enjoy here. Ultimately, the decision to watch or skip the show comes down to personal preference and what viewers are looking to get out of a true crime drama.

You May Also Like

More From Author