The Boston Strangler, a new true crime drama starring Keira Knightley and Barry Keoghan, has been met with mixed reviews from critics and audiences alike. While some have praised the film’s strong performances and attention to detail, others have found it to be lackluster and unengaging.

To understand why the Boston Strangler has fallen flat, it’s important to examine its strengths and weaknesses in relation to other true crime dramas. One of the most notable aspects of the film is its commitment to accuracy. Based on real-life events, the Boston Strangler tells the story of Albert DeAngelo, who was convicted of murdering nine women in Boston during the 1960s. The film’s attention to detail and commitment to the truth are commendable, but they also make it difficult to separate fact from fiction.

Another issue with the Boston Strangler is its lack of emotional resonance. While the murders are horrific, there isn’t much depth or nuance to the characters. Keira Knightley and Barry Keoghan do their best with the material they’re given, but the script doesn’t give them much to work with. Additionally, the film doesn’t explore any deeper themes or motivations behind DeAngelo’s actions. As a result, it comes across as more like a straightforward retelling of events than a true crime drama that delves into the human psyche.

Despite these flaws, there are still some standout moments in the Boston Strangler. The film is at its best when it showcases the investigative work being done by Detective Michael Callahan, played by Mark Ruffalo. The scenes in which he and his team piece together the clues and track down DeAngelo are well-executed and engaging. Additionally, the film’s recreation of the 1960s setting is well-done, bringing to life a time when Boston was a city on the cusp of change.

Overall, the Boston Strangler is a middling true crime drama that has its moments but ultimately falls short in terms of emotional resonance and thematic depth. While it’s commendable for its commitment to accuracy, it could have benefited from more nuanced characters and a deeper exploration of DeAngelo’s motivations. If you’re looking for a true crime drama that really captures the human psyche, look no further than Zodiac or Mindhunter. But if you want to see a well-executed recreation of a pivotal moment in Boston history, the Boston Strangler is worth checking out.

FAQs:

  1. Who was the Boston Strangler?
    The Boston Strangler was Albert DeAngelo, who was convicted of murdering nine women in Boston during the 1960s.
  2. What was the main problem with the Boston Strangler?
    The main problem with the Boston Strangler is its lack of emotional resonance and thematic depth. The characters aren’t well-developed, and there isn’t much depth or nuance to the story beyond the horrific murders.
  3. Was the Boston Strangler based on real events?
    Yes, the Boston Strangler was based on real events, making it all the more important for the film to get the details right.
  4. What did critics say about the Boston Strangler?
    Critics have been mixed in their reviews of the Boston Strangler, praising its strong performances and attention to detail but finding it to be lackluster and unengaging overall.

You May Also Like

More From Author